Sunday, May 22, 2011

Children's interaction with mobile phones

Children get first mobile phone at average age of eight
Eight is the average age at which children are given their first mobile phone, according to a survey.

Children get first mobile phone at average age of eight

Its survey also found that three-quarters of all children aged seven to 15 owned "at least" one mobile.
The charity's survey highlighted how early children now become financially aware – with peer pressure forcing them to get to grips with money to afford mobile phone ringtones, call costs and computer games.

It found that children as young as seven were offering to do chores in exchange for cash to buy ringtones.

But researchers were also told that by the age of 10, children were shopping online using their parents' debit or credit cards.
A third of children (32 per cent) have used the internet to buy computer games.

A quarter of the 546 children surveyed have voted in television competitions, which can often cost £1 or more to enter.

But only 18 per cent have bought a book online.

Wendy van den Hende, chief executive of the charity, said: "Children today face a kind of 'technological tipping point' forcing them to develop financial awareness at an earlier age.

"It is therefore, vital, that they are equipped with the skills and judgment to make sound decisions about money management from an early age."

The research also found that average weekly pocket money now stands at £6.32.

The online survey carried out by Populus questioned 1,435 people including 546 children aged seven to 15, 676 parents and 759 grandparents between January 16 and 26.

Stephen Adams (2009). 
The Telegraph. Children get first mobile phone at average age of eight. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/4680507/Children-get-first-mobile-phone-at-average-age-of-eight.html 

The press - 2010

Parents on the other hand (at least, the group spoken to for this article) seem to have quite strong feelings about the right age, with 13 being the average age most seem comfortable to let their children have greater independence in their use of cellphones and the internet.

You only need to spend a short time with a group of 11 to 12-year- olds, however, before you'll find that cellphone use and texting is a huge part of their social lives - for the many who have phones.
Ask kids aged six and up, and you'll find many have email accounts and belong to online clubs that are junior versions of social-networking sites.
As for Facebook, it's not unusual to find 11 and 12-year-olds with a Facebook page, even though that means they've had to be less than truthful about their age - Facebook requires that you state your age is 13 before you can sign up.
Much like liquor sites. You can easily lie to say that your 18, when your not. If it can't be patrolled why make the rules?
Mostly, parents are positive about the benefits of technologies such as cellphones - being able to keep in touch with their kids was seen as a major benefit by all the parents interviewed.
But the capacity for bullying through texting, and the loss of privacy through the posting of photographs on social-networking pages, is the flipside that has many parents concerned.
Researchers such as Associate Professor Geoff Lealand, Screen and Media Studies, University of Waikato, caution against over- reacting. He urges parents to tread softly with their desire to control their kids' use of technology. "Strict, inflexible rules tend to be counter- productive and can increase the allure of 'forbidden' technology," says Lealand. "Better to be open and fair-minded about it - and acknowledge that your children are often more at ease and competent with technology than you are."
Similarly, Martin Cocker, executive director of NetSafe New Zealand, says that "protective mechanisms (of which denying access is the most basic) have limited value as safety tools".
Netsafe is a non-profit organisation that promotes safe and responsible use of cyberspace, and Cocker says the best path for parents is to educate their kids about the benefits and downsides of each technology. Parents should play a supervisory role while their kids are young, preparing them to make good decisions when they're old enough to be independent.
Meanwhile, your offspring will undoubtedly have a wide array of tech skills to teach you in return.
Cellphones
Parents and experts made clear distinctions here - it all depended on how the phone was used.
Parents all said cellphones were OK for their kids from whatever age they were first out and about on their own and might need to contact their parents. One family had a "family cellphone" which the nine or 11-year-old could use if they were out on their own.
A survey at one local school recently reported that 60 per cent of the year seven and eight children had a cellphone. Many of the parents interviewed for this article however felt high school, or age 13, was the more appropriate time for kids to have their own phone.
All parents expressed concern about the risks of text bullying. One mother said she wanted to hold off as long as possible from her 11-year-old having her own phone. She said face-to-face contact was the best way for kids to have contact with their friends. Other parents said texting was an inevitable part of their children's social lives and the important thing was that they knew how to text responsibly.
As for Martin Cocker from NetSafe, he says cellphones can play an important safety role, but the flip side is that the phones can be used to bully others.
"The question is not so much about access to a phone, but when a child is old enough to have their own private mobile phone."
And as for web-enabled phones, they are "definitely not for young children - if you don't think your child is old enough to have a computer in their room - you shouldn't be giving them a web-enabled phone".
Email accounts
As one mum put it, email is the new postal system, so it's hard to argue for restrictions. She let her children have email accounts from age six up. Other parents, however, said their kids were aged up to 13 before they got an email address. Given so much work is increasingly web-focused at primary schools however, an email account for pre-teens will be increasingly common.
As Geoff Lealand of Waikato University says, an email account is "pretty much a necessity, from primary school age, to assist with study and homework and generally connecting with a world beyond their usual experience.
"But they often need guidance in making judgments and evaluating content."
Martin Cocker of Netsafe, too, says children should have access to free email accounts as soon as they are "technology literate". Parents could help by setting up email accounts for their children and helping them learn how to manage them. It was a good idea to talk to kids about appropriate use.
Facebook
When is the right age for a social- networking page such as Facebook? According to Facebook, age 13. But all you need to do to get a Facebook page is to say you're at least 13 (even if you are not) so there are many under- 13s with a profile. Geoff Lealand from Waikato University says the minimum age set by Facebook seems reasonable.
Parents interviewed for this article also felt that 13 should be the minimum age. One dad said he thought social-networking sites were a poor way of socialising; and that it was too easy to write hurtful things or be hurt. "You don't want your kids to be part of a mob, or be victims. Young ones don't have the skills to sniff out when things are turning nasty."
But among parents and researchers there's also a certain acceptance that if kids want to use social-networking sites, they will - with parents' permission or not.
So if you have a child using Facebook, the key thing to do is talk about their privacy settings. Facebook, for example, lets you limit access to your account to only people whom you've accepted as friends - a better option than allowing open access for anyone, anywhere to browse through your social life.
And make sure you talk about possible consequences - a teacher trainee in Pennsylvania in the United States posted a picture of herself on MySpace with a plastic cup in her hand and wearing a pirate hat, with the caption "Drunken Pirate".
The educational institution where she was enrolled decided the photo promoted drinking, in virtual view of her under-age students.
Only days before her graduation, she was denied her teaching degree.
Internet access in bedrooms
Experts and parents interviewed for this piece were pretty much in agreement here - for the under- 13s, computers are best in communal areas where parental supervision is possible.
One dad said although computers were needed for a lot of homework, his family just had the one family computer in a shared space. He was concerned at the potential dangers of general computer roaming (exposure to spam, viruses and porn) so his kids were only allowed to access pages that had been bookmarked as favourites.
One mum said her 13 and 15-year-olds had to have laptops for school, but they used them in the lounge only.
Another said she thought computers in kids' room were OK from the age of 15. One mother, however, said her son, who is academically gifted, had had a computer in his own room since he was very young and had never given a moment's concern over his use. As a general preventive measure, she recommended letting kids know you can check their email accounts and Google histories at any time.
Martin Cocker of NetSafe advocates a cautious approach.
"Unsupervised internet access is a big step. The internet is a window to the world, with all of challenges that brings [including] sexual solicitation, harassment, online scams and fraud, time management, and negative digital footprint issues.
"Assuming a good relationship with supportive peers and family, most secondary-aged school children would be equipped to deal with those challenges. The majority of primary-aged children are not."
The Press (2010). How young is too young? Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/the-press/lifestyle/4007092/How-young-is-too-young

Call for minimum age of 14 to own cellphones

BY JOHN HARTEVELT

Teenagers who prefer texting to talking have driven some parents to call for a minimum cellphone ownership age of 14.
"Parents are worried teenagers are losing the ability to properly communicate with eye-to-eye contact," said Shanti Ravichandran, of Auckland's Unitec, who has surveyed parents' attitudes to teenage cellphone use.
She said the use of text language was "overpowering" among teenagers, with some even using it in school examinations.
Influences in everyday life.
Ravichandran, a Master of Computing graduate, said 52 per cent of the 115 parents or caregivers she surveyed felt there should be a minimum age of 14 for cellphone ownership.
"They linked it to that because they said until you're 14 you're not allowed to do anything legally alone in this country," she said. "If you want to stay at home alone, for example, you should be a minimum of 14 years old."
Before 14, children should be able to communicate face to face, she said. "You need a device only when you tend to be alone and independent."
Young teenagers were at a crossroads and often in a teenage crisis. "On top of that, you've got a device which opens up a virtual life," she said.
"You have your own private space and you have a person on the other side of the cellphone. You don't have a significant connection. You'll only carry the message and not the emotion."
Ravichandran said many children younger than 14 had cellphones. "From 2005 to 2009 there has been a rapid change in cellphone use," she said.
Parents' main concerns about cellphones were text bullying, addiction to text messaging and the negative impact on communication skills, she said.
"Because it is so discreet, teenagers are doing it under their sheets and they're not getting enough sleep."
Parents were also worried about "macro co-ordination", where a single message was sent around a network of people.
Ravichandran said some parents cited Christchurch's Edgeware Rd tragedy, where two schoolgirls were killed at an out-of-control party attended by teenagers encouraged to attend through a mass text message.
Cellphones could be useful for teenagers to stay in touch with their parents while out, she said. But 86 per cent of parents said the negatives of cellphone use outweighed the positives.
A Unicef report released this year showed New Zealand's 15 to 24-year-olds were among the highest users of cellphones and the internet. There were 94 cellphone owners and 79 internet users per 100 Kiwis aged between 15 and 24, it said.
New Zealand's fastest texter is being sought by LG Mobile in a contest starting at Christchurch's Northlands Shopping Centre today and tomorrow. One finalist will be chosen from each city, with the winner given $10,000 and a trip to New York to compete in the LG Mobile World Cup in early December.
John Hartevelt. (2009). The Press. Call for minimum age of 14 to own cellphones.Retrieved from http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3017255/Call-for-minimum-age-of-14-to-own-cellphones

visual language and typefaces




The defined look of the iphone keyboard could be one way to visually make the connection between the iphone use and the terms and conditions, without using the typical 'iphone frame'. 



Conversation style visuals??


What font does the iPhone interface use?
To the delight of font purists everywhere, the iPhone system interface uses Helvetica or a variant thereof.
The original iPhoneiPhone 3G and iPhone 3GS system interface uses Helvetica. As first noted by the always excellent DaringFireball, the iPhone 4 models use a subtly revised font called "Helvetica Neue." DaringFireball also notes that this change is related to the iPhone 4 display rather than the iOS 4 operating system and older iPhone models running iOS 4 still use Helvetica as the system font.
iPod models released prior to the iPhone use either Chicago, Espy Sans, or Myriad and use Helvetica after the release of the iPhone.
Every ipod (2010). iphone Q & A. Retrieved from http://www.everyipod.com/iphone-faq/iphone-who-designed-iphone-font-used-iphone-ringtones.html



iphone research


Click on image to see it full size.


Sizlopediea (2008). A peek into the iphone development timeline. Retrieved from http://www.sizlopedia.com/2008/07/07/iphone-timeline-1999-2008/




iPhone is a multimedia, Internet-enabled mobile phone designed and marketed by Apple Inc. It has a multi-touch screen with virtual keyboard and buttons. The iPhone's functions include those of a camera phone and a portable media player ("iPod"), in addition to text messaging and visual voicemail. It also offers Internet services including e-mail, web browsing, and local Wi-Fi connectivity. It is a quad-band mobile phone that uses the GSM standard, hence has international capability. It supports the Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution (EDGE) data technology.Following the success of iPod, Apple announced the iPhone in January 2007. The announcement was preceded by rumors and speculations that circulated for several months. The iPhone was introduced, first in the United States on June 29, 2007 with much media frenzy and then in the United Kingdom, Germany and France in November 2007. It was named Time magazine's Invention of the Year in 2007. 


White & Green (2008). The History of the iphone. Retrieved from http://www.xtimeline.com/timeline/History-of-iPhone

What am I up to?

Central Proposition

New Zealand is taking onboard a new smart phone system, 'Payforit' which will be launched late 2011 or early next year. Pullar-Strecker says "Payforit doesn't require customers to identity themselves, register to use the service, or even remember a password (2011)". Apparently the objective or the scheme is to "promote a safe and trustworthy environment". How trustworthy are we when it comes to using other peoples phones and is this actually just to make downloading easier so that companies get more money through 'accidental purchases'?

At the moment when using an iphone you get asked for your password to confirm an application purchase. You can save this password to your phone and many people do. However it's the same with the computer, you get asked for passwords for everything and its up to the individual to decide which ones to always be signed in, and which ones not to. Payforit takes away this choice. According to The Dominon Post there are already children spending up to $2,000 in a virtual world on virtual furniture on their parents smart-phones (2011). Part of this issue stems from Parents not reading the terms and conditions when they enter their credit card details to purchase the game, this means any in app purchases are often charged to the credit card. Children often don't have any concept of the value of money and these sorts of event are occurring more and more regularly. And then there are people saying that by taking away the privacy and password settings we are promoting "a safe and trustworthy environment"? This isn't how the world works. 

What it comes down to is that no-one reads the terms and conditions anymore. They are often long, full of tedious law based points of information and if people havn't had trouble before they simply trust the brand, tick the box and go for it. I'd like to raise awareness of this blind trust in brands and companies and make a point about the importance of reading the terms and conditions. 

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Scale experiment 1. (no I'm not a copy writer)

By using my smartphone I can let people see which Doctor's I attend to pick up my anti-depressants, where I met my convict Dad for a drink last night and where I stopped by to have a quickie with my sisters husband last night.  This information is used for market research, what are they going to do? Send me ad's for nymphomaniac's anonymous. Sometimes this information can get leaked or hacked, or maybe people sell it? I could have a stalker ooo the excitement, could be a fine young chap, you never know, or perhaps he'll be on the war path, gosh, didn't consider that.   But in the mean time I could get a charmingly large bill for playing playing smurfs village, apparently I brought too many smurfberries, infact 10,000 of them. You'd think I'd remember that! What are smurfberries anyway, maybe I'll get them delivered to my door next week. Turns out little trudy (Sisters son, yes the one I'm shagging) got onto my phone when we were uhh a bit preoccupied. Who pays for that bill of $5,000?? Ya me, wow, that was an expensive shag that night wasn't it! Then Friday night out on the town with the girls and who gets so drunk she looses her phone? Once again.. me. Hey maybe I'll get an ad on alcoholics anonymous too, and some counseling all round, hey you guys know me as well as I do by now. So my phone is lost at at 6am, throbbing headache and unable to get myself up, I hear a smash as the door literally falls to the ground. "Police warrant, you'r under arrest!". Oh shit, my history is catching up on me, still too drunk to move, doesn't matter, they pin me to the ground just incase I decide to make a run for it, wouldn't though, too sore. Get dragged into the po po car in handcuffs for producing and uploading illegal kiddy porn. Ummm so I mighta bin smashed off my face but there's no way my drunk night would of entailed that, pity though because I have no recollection of my whereabouts between 1am and 6am this morning. Screw! I explained I'd lost my phone "oldest trick in the book girl, not buying it". What?! Truth don't count for nothing any more.
Always read the small print: Passwords and privacy functionality, don't give them access.

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Brainstorming and inspiration

So after darting around and changing my topic, I've decided to revert back to the original topic. Looking at the lack of security systems on cell phones and how unaware people are of this. 

In class I did some brainstorming:
No privacy, no locks, no safety. Wallets, bank cards with no pin or signature required. Money growing on trees, everything free. Looking at the ad at the start of dvd's you rent "You wouldn't steal a car! You wouldn't steal a film!" etc. 

What age am I targeting? 7-15. The age where you understand what you are doing is wrong. 

Pam mentioned when she first got a mobile phone she had no concept of cost. It was on a plan so she just rung everyone. The bill came after the first month and it was $300. The plan vs pre-paid. Educating kids of cost/value in comparison to what they earn/have.

I figure that the info on the no-password concept is in the terms and conditions when people download or start playing games. So my idea is about scale, making the terms and conditions far bigger than the typical fine print. 

Do I.. Make it full of ridiculous information with one fact in there, get peoples attention and see if they pick up on the point? Real fact could be bigger, bolder etc.

Or.. Fill it with real facts from all sorts of places which you wouldn't expect to come across. Make it entertaining and truthful. I don't need to be subtle with my message because I have the best interests of the viewer in mind. It's about information and education.

While on the bus back to Wellington the other day I saw this and was particularly confused. Firstly because I expected it to be the typical sign about chance of fire etc. And secondly because I didn't understand if it was a joke or serious. It was on the way into a small town, levin I think it was, which is where you usually see the fire danger signs. As far as I knew (which is nothing about eczema) the weather didn't effect it, maybe it does, I wouldn't have a clue. 

Then going into the next town I saw a sign the same but with the heading "Facial Eczema Spore Count". More confusion, but still it stood out to me because it was different information in a familiar place. I could keep this in mind with my final outcome.


According to RD1 I found out its actually about animals, not the eczema that people get as such.

The facts on facial eczema

Article supplied by Agri-feeds Limited.
Facial Eczema (FE) is caused by a toxin sporidesmin produced by a pasture fungus Pithomyces Chartarum which thrives in warm moist conditions, found mostly in rye grass dominant pastures. This toxin is ingested by animals grazing affected pasture.

Symptoms

The period between spore ingestion and first symptoms depends on the amount of toxic spores actually consumed but can occur within 24 hours.
Affected animals are likely to:
  • Go off their feed
  • Stop milking
  • Become restless
  • Seek shade
  • Start licking, rubbing and scratching affected areas 
After a few weeks:
  • Skin lesions start to appear around the face, nostrils, ears, teats, vulva, and on any white areas
  • Skin becomes reddened and inflamed, and may then thicken, encrust, blister and weep
  • Liver damage and in severe cases, signs of jaundice may be visible
  • Ultimately, cows may dry off completely
  • Animals pass into a state of chronic ill-health or in extreme cases die. Others may show no clinical signs at all.
Sub-clinical signs:
  • Increased barrenness
  • Increased deaths at lambing and calving
  • Decreased wool and meat growth
  • Depressed milk production
Farmers often attribute these signs to something else. The reality however, is these are signs that stock are suffering from sub-clinical facial eczema. Productivity and income will be significantly affected.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011



Consumer NZ is calling for Mahu Mother and Baby Skin Care products containing a banned ingredient to be withdrawn from sale immediately.
Mahu products are marketed as natural, NZ-made and the "safest choice" for you and your baby. But Consumer has found Mahu products on sale, including a baby lotion, that list a preservative called iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC). IPBC is not allowed in moisturisers or any other "leave on" preparations for children under three years of age.
The chemical is also banned from use in body lotions and creams intended for use on a "large part of the body" and in any oral hygiene or lip care products. However, Consumer found IBPC listed as an ingredient in Mahu Stretch Mark Lotion and Mahu Nipple Cream.
IPBC is better known as a timber preservative. In its pure form, it's classified by the Environmental Risk Management Authority (ERMA) as having acute oral toxicity and inhalation toxicity. It is considered safe in some cosmetics such as shampoos and deodorants in low concentrations.
IPBC has also been identified as a potential contact allergen. Despite this, Mahu products Consumer bought state "Contains no ingredients that are potentially harmful".
Mahu director Kathryn Fromont told Consumer it stopped using IPBC after restrictions on the ingredient's use were strengthened in 2008, and had asked retailers to withdraw the products. However, Consumer NZ readily found what appeared to be old stock. Fromont said the company would write to retailers again and ask them to remove products.
Consumer chief executive Sue Chetwin said the company should issue an immediate recall. "We've also raised our concerns with ERMA. Better enforcement of product standards is required to ensure consumer safety."
The problems with Mahu's products were discovered as part of our research on so-called "natural" cosmetics, published in this month's Consumer. Chetwin says there's a growing number of cosmetics claiming to be "organic" or "natural" and which are no-such thing.
"We bought 18 brands of skincare products readily available in stores, all of which made claims to be natural options. But behind the marketing hype, many had surprising ingredients," Chetwin said. "Several used the word 'organic' in their brand name but contained synthetic ingredients that wouldn't pass any rigorous organic standard."
Three products - Avalon Organics Lavender Daily Moisturiser, Giovanni Organic Hair Care LA Natural Styling Gel and Jason Pure, Natural & Organic Apricot Deodorant - are made in the US. These brands have been labelled "organic cheater-brands" by the US Organic Consumers Association which has filed a complaint with regulators alleging their products are mostly non-organic formulations.
Kiwi-made product Earths Organics Hand + Body Cream - Violet and Chamomile may contain organic manuka honey and sweet almond oil, but it also contains preservatives butyl paraben, ethyl paraben, methyl paraben, phenolyethanol and propyl paraben. Another, The Aromatherapy Company's Organic Fig and Olive Hand Balm which claims to be made with "the purity of nature" also contains synthetic substances.
Parabens are widely used in cosmetics but questions continue to be raised about the toxicity of some of these substances. Existing rules allow their use in low concentrations. Many cosmetics claim to be "paraben-free" but parabens have often been replaced in these products with other synthetic preservatives.
Only two of the 18 which claimed to be "organic" or "natural" had recognised eco accreditations. They were Dr Hauschka Rose Day Cream Light and Living Nature Refreshing Body Lotion.
Chetwin said products sold as natural or organic needed to demonstrate they lived up to their claims. Making misleading claims is an offence under the Fair Trading Act.
Consumer NZ wants a mandatory standard for "natural" cosmetic claims - one that sets out companies' obligations for ensuring claims are accurate, unambiguous and verifiable.
If you're buying "natural" cosmetics check the ingredients list carefully. Many are likely to contain synthetic chemicals.